ABSTRACT
Introduction: A teacher is a person who educates others and is considered a role model to transmit the value of life. School is considered an important setting for comprehensive health promotion. Teachers can act as a bridge to pass health information and behaviour that they learn to students, families, and Communities. The major pivot in the present study is to assess the teacher’s trainees about health knowledge, attitude, and practices during their training course. Objectives: To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of health-related topics in teacher’s training course Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the B Ed and D Ed colleges of field practice area with a sample size was 150. It was a questionnaire-based study. Information was collected based on the interview method. Results: Knowledge and practice were better in B Ed trainees. The attitude of the trainees is nearly equal. Conclusions: The disparity is majorly based on their previous educational status. Those who have opted for B Ed have passed degrees like B.SC or B.A and trainees doing D Ed have joined immediately after the completion of their 12th standard. Hence, their knowledge of health-related topics is limited compared to B Ed trainees
ABSTRACT
Aims: Tinea corporis & cruris of skin respond well to topical antifungal therapy, but there is a need to apply cream 2- 3 times daily for up to four weeks will impair compliance & lead to treatment failure. Luliconazole is one of those drugs offering good efficacy & tolerability with a short duration of treatment. Terbinafine, an allylamine antifungal agent, acts by selective inhibition of fungal squalene epoxidase. Luliconazole, an imidazole antifungal agent is considered to be more effective in inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis and its reservoir property in stratum corneum is greater than that of terbinafine. As there are lack of studies between terbinafine & luliconazole, the present study was undertaken to compare the clinical efficacy in tinea corporis/tinea cruris patients. Study Design: Prospective parallel study. Place and Duration of Study: Study was conducted on 60 patients presenting to the Dermatology out-patient department of RL Jalapa Hospital, Kolar, from 1st December 30th April 2012. Methodology: Patients alternatively assigned to either terbinafine or luliconazole & advised to apply test drugs topically for 14 days. Clinical symptoms & signs were assessed using 4-point (pruritus, erythema, scaling) scale & 10% KOH mount at base line, end of treatment visit (15th day) & later 30th day. The data was analysed based on age, gender distribution, duration of lesion, clinical score & KOH mount. Results: Of the 60 patients recruited, all came for 1st follow up (14th day) & 51 patients for 2nd follow-up (30th day). Mean age of the patients was 33.80± 9.58 years in terbinafine & 33.90 ± 9.58 years luliconazole group. Majority of patients were in 12- 40 years aged in both group. Sixty patients and 51 patients were negative for KOH mount preparation on 15th & 30th day respectively. At the end of first follow-up, the clinical score was reduced from 3 to zero (P=0.0001) in both the treatment groups. Mycological cure was 100% in both the drug groups. There was no relapse in 51 patients who came for 2nd follow-up. Four in terbinafine and 5 in luliconazole group were lost to follow up. Conclusion: Only mild forms of tinea infections were included as compared to other studies where moderate to severe (pustules, incrustations, vesiculation). Hence the onset of illness, treatment duration and severity of illness were favorable in this study for two weeks. In both the treatment arms, clinical & mycological cure was comparable, hence once a day application for two weeks of terbinafine & luliconazole were equally effective for treatment of tinea corporis/cruris infection.